Enveloping algebra is a Yetter–Drinfeld module algebra over Hopf algebra of regular functions on the automorphism group of a Lie algebra
Abstract
We present an elementary construction of a (highly degenerate) Hopf pairing between the universal enveloping algebra of a finite-dimensional Lie algebra over arbitrary field and the Hopf algebra of regular functions on the automorphism group of . This pairing induces a Hopf action of on which together with an explicitly given coaction makes into a braided commutative Yetter–Drinfeld -module algebra. From these data one constructs a Hopf algebroid structure on the smash product algebra retaining essential features from earlier constructions of a Hopf algebroid structure on infinite-dimensional versions of Heisenberg double of , including a noncommutative phase space of Lie algebra type, while avoiding the need of completed tensor products.
We prove a slightly more general result where algebra is replaced by and where is any finite-dimensional Leibniz algebra having as its maximal Lie algebra quotient.
Keywords: Yetter–Drinfeld module algebra, universal enveloping algebra, Lie algebra automorphism, Leibniz algebra, adjoint map
MSC 2020: 16T05, 16S40
1 Introduction
Yetter–Drinfeld modules over bialgebras (2.2 and [9, 10, 14]) are ubiquitous in quantum algebra, low dimensional topology and representation theory. More intricate structure of a braided commutative monoid in the category of Yetter–Drinfeld modules is an ingredient in a construction of scalar extension bialgebroids and Hopf algebroids. Namely, given a Hopf algebra and a braided commutative Yetter–Drinfeld -module algebra , the smash product algebra has a structure of a Hopf algebroid over [1, 2, 11]. An important special case is the Heisenberg double of a finite-dimensional Hopf algebra , where is the dual Hopf algebra of ; the -coaction on is given by an explicit formula involving basis of and the dual basis of ([5], map in Section 6). There are several important examples in literature, some motivated by mathematical physics, when the underlying algebra of is the universal enveloping algebra of an -dimensional Lie algebra . In the example of a noncommutative phase space of Lie algebra type [8], the Hopf algebra is a realization via formal power series of the algebraic dual with its natural topological Hopf algebra structure. Historically, as an algebra has been introduced by extending by deformed derivatives (“momenta”) in [7] and in a rather nonrigorous treatment [13] it has been argued that is actually the Heisenberg double of ; this made plausible that Hopf algebroid structure on could be exhibited analogously to Lu’s example of finite-dimensional double, leading to an ad hoc version of completed Hopf algebroid structure in [8]. An abstract version of is described in [12] as an internal Hopf algebroid in the symmetric monoidal category of filtered cofiltered vector spaces. These examples may be viewed as infinite-dimensional cases of Heisenberg double (in fact, this observation from [13] influenced the Hopf algebroid approach in [8]), but a number of results in [12] show that there are intricate conditions for which infinite-dimensional dually paired Hopf algebras and one can indeed form a Hopf algebroid structure on the smash product algebra , even in a completed sense or even when one of the Hopf algebras is the restricted dual of another. In the case of , formulas from [8] show that there are special elements for such that the coaction on the generators is given by the formulas (adapted to our conventions) . Moreover, elements satisfy the relations which are satisfied by matrix elements of automorphisms of . The prime motivation of this article is to demistify this phenomenon and to find a much smaller Hopf algebra containing an abstract model for and avoiding any completions in describing Yetter–Drinfeld -module structure on .
We show that the Hopf algebra of regular functions on the automorphism group of will do, namely that is a braided commutative Yetter–Drinfeld module -algebra whose structure is given by essentially the same formulas as in the case of from [12]. General formulas for scalar extensions from [11] describe the Hopf algebroid structure on the smash product . In the sequel work [15] we present several other natural examples of Hopf algebras equipped with a Hopf algebra homomorphism and where is still a Yetter–Drinfeld module algebra over without completions. In [15] formulas for the symmetric Hopf algebroid structure are spelled out in full detail.
The main result of this article is actually proved in a slightly more general form than described above. Namely, instead of the automorphism group of a Lie algebra we can take the automorphism group of any finite-dimensional Leibniz algebra such that is the maximal Lie algebra quotient of , enabling a structure of a Hopf algebroid on the smash product .
2 Preliminaries
2.1 General conventions and preliminaries on pairings
Throughout the paper we freely use Sweedler notation with or without the summation sign [6, 9] and the Kronecker symbol . Throughout, is a fixed ground field and the category of -vector spaces. If , . If is a comultiplication on a -coalgebra then for , . If is an associative -algebra with multiplication and unit map , consider its transpose . Restricted dual consists of all such that falls within the image of inclusion . It follows that belongs also to the image of hence the restriction may be corestricted to a map making into a coalgebra; if is a bialgebra (resp. Hopf algebra) then is. Pairings of vector spaces are bilinear maps into the ground field which are in this work not required to be nondegenerate. For , a pairing induces a pairing between and componentwise: . If and is an algebra, and such that there exists an element such that for all , then the functional and . If is a coalgebra then . Thus, if for all , then is a map , and . It is a coalgebra map if moreover . Conversely, if corestricts to a coalgebra map , then the identities and hold for all , . Both conditions hold if and only if is a map of algebras . A pairing between two bialgebras and is Hopf if , and the symmetric conditions , . Clearly, the latter two conditions hold if and only if corestricts to a coalgebra map . Alternatively, the pairing is Hopf if and only if corestricts to a bialgebra map . If and are Hopf algebras, is a bialgebra map between Hopf algebras, hence it automatically respects the antipode. Thus, for every Hopf pairing between Hopf algebras, identity holds for all , .
Replacing Hopf pairing with a bialgebra map is useful in constructing new pairings from old. Namely, if is a biideal (ideal which is also a coideal in the sense that and ), then there is an induced bialgebra map if and only if that is for all .
Lemma 2.1.
Let be a bialgebra pairing.
-
(i)
For the bialgebra pairing to vanish on where is a coideal, it suffices that it vanishes on where is some set of algebra generators of .
-
(ii)
If is a biideal, a set of generators of as an ideal and a set of generators of as an algebra, then the bialgebra pairing vanishes on if, in addition to for all and , one has that for all .
Proof.
(i) Fix any . Then for some . Then .
(ii) To show one needs . The condition on is sufficient for this to hold for all , , . ∎
One often starts by constructing an auxiliary pairing where one of the bialgebras is free [9]. If is a coalgebra, then by the universal property of the tensor algebra there is a unique algebra map extending the composition along inclusion ; this is a comultiplication on making it into a bialgebra. Every coalgebra map to a bialgebra admits a unique extension to a bialgebra map .
We need a different variant of this standard universal property. Suppose as a vector space where is grouplike, that is, , . Ideal in generated by is a biideal because and . Composition is an isomorphism of algebras (the inverse can easily be described); we transfer the comultiplication from to along this isomorphism. By the above universal property, any coalgebra map , where is a bialgebra, extends uniquely to a bialgebra map ; if then it induces a bialgebra map .
Lemma 2.2.
Suppose and is a coalgebra such that is grouplike. Then has a canonical bialgebra structure such that the inclusion is a coalgebra map and for any bialgebra , each coalgebra map mapping to admits a unique extension to a bialgebra map .
2.2 Yetter–Drinfeld module algebras
In this subsection, fix a Hopf -algebra with comultiplication and counit . Recall that the category of right -modules is monoidal: if and are -modules then their tensor product is -module with -action and the unit object is with action , for , , , . A right -module algebra is a monoid in : a right -module with multiplication such that and . One can then form a smash product algebra with underlying -vector space and associative multiplication given by where is an alias for . We often identify with and with (thus for , , denotes and ). We extend to a right action, also denoted , of on by setting .
A right-left Yetter–Drinfeld -module is a unital right -module with a left -coaction , , satisfying Yetter–Drinfeld compatibility condition
(1) |
Morphisms of Yetter–Drinfeld modules are morphisms of underlying modules which are also morphisms of comodules and the tensor product of underlying -modules is a Yetter–Drinfeld module via coaction (notice the order!). Thus we obtain a braided monoidal category of (right-left) Yetter–Drinfeld -modules with braiding given by . For finite-dimensional , is braided monoidally equivalent to the Drinfeld–Majid center of the monoidal category of right -modules.
If is a right -module algebra with a left -coaction and if we identify the underlying vector spaces of and , then the Yetter–Drinfeld compatibility may be rewritten in terms of the multiplication in , as
(2) |
Monoids in are called (right-left) Yetter–Drinfeld -module algebras. They are Yetter–Drinfeld modules with multiplication such that they become -module algebras and -comodule algebras. Notice that an -comodule is the same thing as an -comodule, but saying that it is a comodule algebra is different. If is a Yetter–Drinfeld module and a -linear map, then is braided commutative if , that is, for all . An -module algebra is braided commutative if its multiplication is braided commutative.
Lemma 2.3.
Consider an -module algebra with multiplication and a coaction so that is a Yetter–Drinfeld -module.
-
(i)
Multiplication is braided commutative in if and only if for the extended action of the smash product relation holds.
-
(ii)
Multiplication is braided commutative if and only if all elements of the form , , commute with all elements of the form , , viewed inside algebra .
-
(iii)
Suppose is braided commutative. Then is an -comodule algebra (hence also a Yetter–Drinfeld module algebra) if and only if considered as a map with values in smash product algebra is antimultiplicative.
Proof.
For (i) indeed, the left hand side is . Parts (ii) and (iii) are left to the reader. They are implicit in [2]. ∎
2.3 Leibniz algebras
Left and right Leibniz algebras are nonassociative algebras slightly generalizing Lie algebras by dropping the condition of antisymmetry.
A -vector space equipped with a linear map is a left Leibniz algebra [4] if for every the map is a derivation on , that is, if left Leibniz identity holds for all . Let be a copy of vector space , with elements denoted , , with operations transported via . Denote by the Lie algebra obtained as a quotient of by two-sided ideal generated by all commutators , . It is a Lie algebra and it is maximal in the sense that if , every map to a Lie algebra factors through (if , relation is stronger than the antisymmetry).
Lemma 2.4.
Let be a left Leibniz algebra. Universal enveloping algebra of Lie algebra is isomorphic to , where is the ideal in generated by , .
Proof.
Denote by the image of in . Denote by the image of in . Denote by the image of in . The dashed map in the following diagram satisfies that for every since by the composition of maps in the top row .
Therefore, there exists the map , , and consequently the map . This map satisfies . Therefore, we have induced the map .
On the other hand, in the following diagram
the map induces . By this map for all . Therefore, we obtain a well defined map .
These two maps are inverse to each other. ∎
We say that -vector space together with a linear map is a right Leibniz algebra if for every the map is a derivation on , that is, if the right Leibniz identity holds for all . By quotienting by the ideal generated by we get a maximal quotient Lie algebra, .
Lemma 2.5.
Let be a right Leibniz algebra. Universal enveloping algebra of Lie algebra is isomorphic to , where is the ideal in generated by , .
Proof.
Analogous to proof of Lemma 2.4. ∎
3 as a Yetter–Drinfeld -module algebra
In this section, we prove the central result of this article: for any finite-dimensional Leibniz algebra over any field , the universal enveloping algebra of its maximal quotient Lie algebra is a braided commutative Yetter–Drinfeld module algebra over the Hopf algebra of regular functions on the algebraic group of automorphisms of . This result immediately implies that the smash product algebra has a structure of a Hopf algebroid over base algebras [11]. Its structure is, for the case when is a Lie algebra, spelled out in detail in [15]. Moreover, this structure is related to other, more geometric, examples in [15].
3.1 Hopf algebra
Let be any nonassociative algebra of finite dimension over a field . The general linear group of the underlying vector space, is an affine algebraic group with algebra of regular functions that is therefore a Hopf algebra via and for any [3]. For a chosen ordered basis of , interpreting matrices as operators amounts to an isomorphism . Structure constants are defined by
(3) |
and we introduce as algebra generators of regular functions , where is the -th entry of matrix . As an abstract algebra, is the free algebra on generators modulo the relations . The comultiplication is then given by and with counit . By definition, an element is an automorphism if for all . These relations cut out the subgroup . To see that it is a Zariski closed subgroup, write , and observe that this condition amounts to a system of polynomial equations in ,
In other words, induces an identification with the quotient of by the ideal generated by relations
(4) |
Regarding that the inclusion of subvarieties is also an inclusion of groups, this ideal is Hopf and is the quotient Hopf algebra of functions on the subgroup. One can also directly check that the ideal is a Hopf ideal.
Denote by and the generators of . If is a transition matrix to a basis , , then , . Then extends to a Hopf algebra isomorphism and . This implies within . When it is clear which basis is fixed, will also be denoted by or simply . Assuming the identification , we write
(5) |
Assuming the identification , if is an automorphism of , . The standard reasoning above is summarized in the following proposition.
Proposition 3.1.
Let be a nonassociative algebra of finite dimension with a -basis and structure constants (3). Hopf algebra of regular functions on the affine algebraic group of automorphisms of is as an algebra isomorphic to a commutative algebra with -generators , , and defining relations
(6) |
As a direct consequence the following identities hold for all :
(7) |
(8) |
Isomorphism is a Hopf algebra isomorphism if is given the unique comultiplication and counit which are algebra maps satisfying
(9) |
and the antipode satisfying , for all .
3.2 Hopf pairing
If is a -bialgebra, then a differentiation of is any -linear map such that Leibniz rule holds. In other words, it is a -valued derivation of , where is with the trivial -(bi)module structure coming from the counit. In Hopf algebraic language, a differentiation is a primitive element in the restricted dual bialgebra . The following lemma is standard and elementary.
Lemma 3.2.
Let be any bialgebra such that its underlying algebra is the free unital commutative algebra with a set of free generators . There is a canonical isomorphism between the vector space of set maps and the space of differentiations of which extend these maps.
Assume and is a coalgebra such that and for all . Suppose is paired with such that map corestricts to a coalgebra map for which . Then is a differentiation of . Conversely, by Lemma 3.2 each such is determined by , where the values for the latter can be chosen independently.
Proposition 3.3.
Let be a left Leibniz -algebra with a vector space basis and structure constants determined from , . In the notation of Subsection 3.1, , are the generators of the algebra . Denote also by the image of in .
Then there is a well defined and unique Hopf pairing
such that for all . This Hopf pairing does not depend on the choice of basis.
Proof.
Notice that , the -th matrix element of , hence for all .
Uniqueness. If such a pairing exists, then, , , hence
Thus, and, in particular, .
Denote . By (9), , hence is a polynomial in expressions of the form . Similarly, are determined by .
For any , , where each stands for either or . After expanding , the right-hand side is written in terms of expressions of the form . Therefore, if such a pairing exists, it is unique.
Existence. We first consider the free commutative algebra on the generators, still denoted , and with the same rule (9) for a bialgebra structure (this is the bialgebra of regular functions on the variety of pairs of arbitrary matrices). A unique pairing of with is by Lemma 3.2 extending , by Leibniz rule, requiring that is a differentiation of . We now want to show that there is an induced pairing between and the quotient Hopf algebra ; functionals remain differentiations on the quotient. We need to show that the pairing restricted to vanishes. The biideal of relations has a generating set of all elements of the form , or . Observe that for all . Thus for differentiation we obtain for all and . Therefore if the pairing vanishes on then it vanishes on the ideal generated by .
Thus we need to check and for all . The first equation is
which is left Leibniz identity in terms of the structure constants. By using the differentiation rule, the second equation is simply , which holds for generators by definition. Therefore, there is a well defined pairing such that for all and is a differentiation of for all , that is,
(10) |
This means that is equipped with a comultiplication such that and and the pairing respects : in the notation of Subsection 2.1, restricts to a coalgebra map sending to . By Lemma 2.2 and the equivalence between Hopf pairings and bialgebra maps , we extend this pairing to a unique Hopf pairing ; it is determined by the formula
Denote by the ideal in generated by , . By Lemma 2.4, . Moreover, and , hence is a biideal. Clearly, as Hopf algebras as well.
We now check that the ideal generators of are paired with every element of as . Relation is equivalent to which restates the left Leibniz identity . Similarly, computes to the same identity. Since is a biideal and satisfies , we can apply Lemma 2.1, part (ii), for to conclude that the pairing vanishes on the entire . Therefore, there is a well defined Hopf pairing satisfying .
To show that the pairing does not depend on the choice of basis , note that we started from a pairing defined on by and . For a base change by a numerical matrix , . Likewise for . Induced pairing is uniquely defined by the pairing on and by abstract properties of the extension. Thus, it respects bialgebra isomorphism in the second argument. Once we quotient from down to , becomes an identification (extending (5)), yielding the invariance. ∎
Proposition 3.4.
Let be a right Leibniz -algebra and a -basis of . Denote by structure constants determined from , for . Let be the generators of the algebra from Subsection 3.1. Denote by the image of in .
Then there is a well defined and unique Hopf pairing
such that for all . This Hopf pairing does not depend on the choice of basis.
Proof.
Notice that where is the right adjoint action; thus the main difference from Proposition 3.3 is change of side.
The entire proof is analogous to the proof of Proposition 3.3, hence we skip it. One first observes that, if the pairing exists, must hold. We are presenting as from Lemma 2.5. Key calculations with elements which in Proposition 3.3 boil down to the left Leibniz identity are now replaced by calculations with elements (from Lemma 2.5) and boil down to the right Leibniz identity. For example, is
which is right Leibniz identity . ∎
Remark 3.5.
(Geometric origin of the pairing.) If is or and is a Lie algebra over , then is a linear Lie group and its Lie algebra is . Differential of function at the unit of is a linear functional on , and therefore . Let , . Then .
We prove that the pairing from Proposition 3.3, in the case when is or and is a Lie algebra , agrees on subset of its domain with the pairing defined by
First we check that indeed The exponential map maps a neighborhood of in to a neighborhood of in . We have that
Similarly, one checks that , by using that . By linearity, we conclude that the pairings agree for all and generators . Since the pairing also has the property
we conclude that they agree for all and .
3.3 Main theorem
Theorem 3.6.
Let be a left Leibniz -algebra with vector space basis and structure constants determined from , Let be the generators of the algebra from Subsection 3.1. Denote by the image of in . Then the following holds.
-
(i)
Hopf pairing from Proposition 3.3 induces a right Hopf action by formula
(11) which further induces the structure of a smash product algebra . This action and the smash product do not depend on the choice of basis .
-
(ii)
There is a unique -linear unital antimultiplicative map
such that
(12) Map does not depend on the choice of basis .
-
(iii)
Elements of commute with elements of in .
-
(iv)
Map is a left -coaction on .
-
(v)
is a braided commutative right-left Yetter–Drinfeld module algebra over .
Proof.
(i) Every Hopf pairing induces a right Hopf action in this way. By Proposition 3.3, the pairing, hence also the action, does not depend on the choice of basis.
(ii) We prove that such exists. We first define auxiliary map as a linear map such that for , then expand it to by antimultiplicativity and then we check that , where is the ideal in generated by . We compute
Analogously, . After subtracting,
On the other hand, Equality is now proven. Therefore, by quotienting the domain of by ideal , we induce a well defined map . Additionally, we note that clearly
(13) |
To see that defined by (12) does not depend on the basis , we compute .
(iii) First we check that and commute for all .
By using (13), it is easy to prove the claim inductively for all elements of ,
(14) |
(iv) Coaction axiom on generators , , is apparent from definitions (9) and (12). Both sides of it evaluate to . It is now sufficient to show that, if the coaction axiom is true for , then it is true for the product . We compute
(15) |
from which it follows that, because and are assumed to satisfy the coaction axiom identity,
and, on the other hand,
Counitality of is checked first for generators, for every , and then easily proven inductively by using formula (15).
(v) First, we prove the Yetter–Drinfeld property:
It is -linear both in and in , hence it is sufficient to show it for and being words in generators, by induction on the length of a word. For and ,
The Yetter–Drinfeld property for generators and is proven analogously.
If the identity is true for some and any of the form , then it also holds for the product and all generators of , because and . Indeed,
Therefore, by induction, the identity is true for all and being or .
If the identity holds for some and in and all , then it also holds for the product and all , by
We conclude inductively that the Yetter–Drinfeld property holds.
Finally, let us prove the braided commutativity property:
First we check this on generators. For any two we have
Next, we use induction on the length of the word acted on by on the right, for every . The step of induction is
At last, the step of induction on the length of the word on the right is
∎
Theorem 3.7.
Let be a right Leibniz -algebra with -basis and structure constants determined from , Let be the generators of the algebra from Subsection 3.1. Denote by the image of in .
Then the Hopf pairing defined in Proposition 3.4 induces a right Hopf action by formula
which further induces the structure of a smash product algebra .
Then there also exists a unique -linear unital antimultiplicative map such that
This unique map is a left coaction.
Furthermore, is a braided commutative right-left Yetter–Drinfeld -module algebra. Maps and do not depend on the choice of basis .
Proof.
Analogous to the proof of Theorem 3.6. ∎
References
- [1] G. Böhm, Hopf algebroids, in Handbook of Algebra, Vol. 6, edited by M. Hazewinkel, Elsevier 2009, 173–236, arXiv:0805.3806.
- [2] T. Brzeziński, G. Militaru, Bialgebroids, -bialgebras and duality, J. Alg. 251 (2002) 279–294 math.QA/0012164
- [3] P. Cartier, A primer of Hopf algebras, Frontiers in number theory, physics, and geometry II, 537–615, Springer 2007.; preprint IHÉS M-06-40, 2006.
- [4] J.-L. Loday, T. Pirashvili, Universal enveloping algebras of Leibniz algebras and (co)homology, Math. Ann. 296 (1993) 139–158.
- [5] J-H. Lu, Hopf algebroids and quantum groupoids, Int. J. Math. 7 (1996) 47–70, q-alg/9505024
- [6] S. Majid, Foundations of quantum group theory, Cambridge University Press 1995.
- [7] S. Meljanac, Z. Škoda, Leibniz rules for enveloping algebras, arXiv:0711.0149
- [8] S. Meljanac, Z. Škoda, M. Stojić, Lie algebra type noncommutative phase spaces are Hopf algebroids, Lett. Math. Phys. 107:3, (2017) 475–503 arXiv:1409.8188
- [9] D. E. Radford, Hopf algebras, World Scientific 2012.
- [10] D. E. Radford, J. Towber, Yetter–Drinfeld categories associated to an arbitrary bialgebra, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 87 (1993) 259–279
- [11] M. Stojić, Scalar extension Hopf algebroids, Journal of Algebra and its Applications (2023) arXiv:2208.11696
- [12] M. Stojić, Completed Hopf algebroids, doctoral dissertation in Croatian language (of the title Upotpunjeni Hopfovi algebroidi), University of Zagreb (2017)
- [13] Z. Škoda, Heisenberg double versus deformed derivatives, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 26, Nos. 27 & 28 (2011) 4845–4854. arXiv:0806.0978
- [14] Z. Škoda, M. Stojić, Hopf algebroids with balancing subalgebra, J. Alg. 598 (2022) 445–469 arXiv:1610.03837
- [15] M. Stojić, Z. Škoda, Examples of scalar extension Hopf algebroids over a universal enveloping algebra, preprint.
Authors’ Addresses:
Zoran Škoda, Department of Teachers’ Education, University of Zadar, Franje Tudjmana 24, 23000 Zadar, Croatia zskoda@unizd.hr
Martina Stojić, Department of Mathematics, University of Zagreb, Bijenička cesta 30, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia stojic@math.hr